Volume 40, Number 2
Patrick R. Lake, Editor
November 2004
SACJTC
ANNUAL MEETINGSunday, December 4, 2005
11:30–1:00 p.m.
Centennial 2 ~ Ballroom Level
Hyatt Regency
Atlanta, Georgia
PRESIDING
Dr. Millicent M. Valek
President, Brazosport CollegeWELCOME
Dr. Millicent M. ValekINVOCATION
Dr. James M. Mitchell
President, Wallace State Community CollegeBUSINESS SESSION
Financial Report
Dr. Marshall W. Smith
President, John Tyler Community CollegeElection of Board Members and Officers
Dr. L. Steve Thornburg
President, Cleveland Community CollegeINTRODUCTION OF SPEAKER
Dr. Randy Pierce
President, Georgia Highlands CollegeKEYNOTE ADDRESS
Dr. Belle S. Wheelan
President, Commission on Colleges
"Where Do We Go From Here?"DOOR PRIZES
Dr. Chuck Mojock
President, Lake Sumter Community College
2005 OFFICERS OF THE ASSOCIATION
PRESIDENT
Dr. Millicent M. Valek
President, Brazosport College
VICE PRESIDENT
Dr. Willis Lott
President, Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College
SECRETARY / TREASURER
Dr. Marshall W. Smith
President, John Tyler Community College
PAST PRESIDENT
Dr. L. Steve Thornburg
President, Cleveland Community College
EDITOR
Dr. Patrick R. Lake
President, Henderson Community College
BOARD MEMBERS
Class of 2005
Dr. Barry W. Russell, President, Midlands Technical CollegeClass of 2006
Dr. James M. Mitchell, President, Wallace State Community College
Dr. Chuck Mojock, President, Lake Sumter Community College
Dr. Randy Pierce, President, Georgia Highlands College
Dr. Tommy Warner, President, Nunez Community CollegeClass of 2007
Dr. Wade McCamey, President, Walters State Community College
SACJTC provides a support network of more than 300 two-year colleges through which ideas and information can be shared as community college presidents face the challenges of the 21st Century. The association represents a collective voice which provides advocacy and leadership regarding issues of critical importance to two-year colleges in the South.
Access to a legitimate avenue from a unified professional voice with SACS to address regional issues and to have an impact on policies and procedures that relate directly to two-year colleges;
Sponsorship at the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) convention of the annual luncheon, featuring a prominent speaker;
Recognition of outstanding practices among member institutions;
Encouragement of professional development, networking, and idea exchanges among college CEOs, administrators, and faculty;
Communication among member institutions via the SACJTC Newsletter;
Opportunities for professional to submit ideas for publication in issues of the SACJTC Occasional Paper.
SACJTC 2004 BUDGET AND ACTUAL & PROPOSED 2005 BUDGET*
*Approved by the SACJTC Board of Directors on April 9, 2005.
INCOME
2004 (budget) 2004 (actual) 2005 (proposed)
1. Dues $100 $25,000 (250) $23,600 (236) $25,000 (250)
2. Luncheon tickets $11,250 (375) $11,160 (372) $11,250 (375)
3. Interest Income $ 1,000 $ 508 $ 600
4. Miscellaneous $ -0- $ -0- $ -0-
5. Corporate Sponsorships – Luncheon
$ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000
INCOME TOTAL $44,250 $42,268 $43,850
1. Newsletter/Occasional Papers
$ 700 $ 0 $ 700
2. Annual Luncheon
SACS/COC
Processing Fee $ 500 $
500 $ 500
Meal $18,000 $ 14,302 $17,000
Speaker $ 2,000 $ 0 $ 2,000
Speaker Travel $ 1,000 $ 0 $ 1,000
Printing (Program/Tickets/Flyer)
$ 1,200 $ 653 $ 1,000
Miscellaneous (shipping/signs/AV)
$ 700 $ 116 $ 500
Complimentary Tickets/Refunds
$ 360 $ 270 $ 360
3. Books $ 0
$ 3,782 $ 0
Services Sub-Total
$24,460 $ 19,623 $23,060
1. Spring Meeting Travel $ -0- $ -0- $ -0-
2. Spring Meeting Expenses $ 500 $ -0- $ 500
3. Awards $ 400 $ 299 $ 400
4. Dec. Dinner or Breakfast Meeting
$ 1,000 $ 941 $ 1,000
Board Sub-Total $ 1,900 $ 1,240 $ 1,900
1. Editor $ 800 $ 800 $ 800
2. Editor Assistant $ 500 $ 500 $ 500
3. Secretary / Treasurer / Asst. $ 1,300 $ 1,300 $ 0
Honoraria Sub-Total $ 2,600 $ 2,600 $ 1,300
1. Postage $ 300 $ 148 $ 300
2. Operating Supplies $ 1,000 $ 500 $ 1,000
3. Duplicating / Printing $ 300 $ 38 $ 300
4. Database Conversion/Updates $ 500 $ 648 $ 0
5. Miscellaneous (Web) $ 400 $ 0 $ 400
6. Administrative Office Support $15,000 $ 2,000 $15,000
Operating Sub-Total $17,500 $ 3,334 $17,000
TOTAL EXPENSES $46,460 $ 26,797 $43,260
REVENUE / EXPENSES $ 15,471 $ 590
Developing an Accountability System for Two-Year Institutions
Christina E.
Whitfield, Ph.D.
Director of Research and Policy Analysis
Kentucky Community and Technical College System
Community and technical colleges throughout the United States operate in atmosphere of increased emphasis on accountability and information sharing. This milieu is epitomized by U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spelling’s February 2005 admonition to a group of community college leaders: “In God we trust, all others bring data.”[1] Most two-year institutions can access a broad range of data elements describing their students, faculty, and finances. How can this data be converted into useful accountability information?
Over the past year, the Kentucky Community and Technical College System (KCTCS) developed an accountability system to support its 2006-10 Strategic Plan. The KCTCS system is organized around four goals adopted by the KCTCS Board of Regents in December 2004:
o Promote excellence in teaching and learning
o Increase student access and success
o Expand diversity and global awareness
o Enhance the economic development of communities and the Commonwealth
The development of the KCTCS accountability system was an iterative process involving input from a wide range of stakeholders, including the Board of Regents, senior administrators from the system and KCTCS colleges, faculty, and research staff. More than 100 potential performance measures were identified. The process culminated with the selection of one- and five-year targets for 14 measures. KCTCS will issue quarterly reports on these measures and progress toward the strategic planning goals.
KCTCS Performance Measures |
|
Credentials Awarded per 100 Students |
Retention Rate |
Percent of Developmental Students Passing First College-Level Course, by Subject |
Number of Transfers to Four-Year Institutions |
Results from Community College Survey of Student Engagement |
Enrollment in Multi-Cultural Courses |
Net College Cost a Percent of Median Family Income |
Minority Enrollment |
Credentials Awarded |
Number of Businesses Served |
Headcount Enrollment |
Licensure/Certification Pass Rate |
Participation Rate |
Workforce Development Enrollment |
The KCTCS experience suggests several parameters for successful accountability initiatives:
· Emphasize the national perspective. The KCTCS vision is “to create a comprehensive community and technical college system recognized as the nation’s best.” Accordingly, the KCTCS accountability system uses national definitions, data sources, and standards where possible. Several KCTCS accountability measures are adapted from Measuring Up, the state-by-state report card on higher education produced by the National Center for Public Policy in Higher Education, allowing comparisons to contiguous and best-performing states.
· Stress outcomes for students. As Secretary Spelling’s oft-repeated quote indicates, policy makers and higher education leaders are especially interested in information about student learning outcomes. Like other two-year institutions, KCTCS considers access a critical aspect of its mission (since KCTCS was founded in 1998, the system has experienced 64 percent enrollment growth). The performance measures selected for the 2006-10 Strategic Plan reflect the system’s commitment to hold itself accountable for student outcomes as well as access. Community college accountability systems should answer questions such as: Are our graduates prepared for the workforce? Do our students transfer to four-year institutions? How successful are our remediation efforts?
· Recognize missing elements. Accountability systems are necessarily limited by available data; it may prove necessary to establish “placeholders” until all elements of the strategic plan can be measured. KCTCS plans to include direct measures of student learning and detailed information about graduates’ employment patterns as they become available.
As more two-year institutions and systems develop accountability systems, national standards for measurement and performance will emerge. These efforts will better equip community and technical colleges to answer the charge to “bring data.”
[1] “Arguing for a federal program? Bring hard data, education secretary tells community college leaders” The Chronicle of Higher Education, February 17, 2005.
[2] Alfred, Richard, et al. Core Indicators of Effectiveness for Community College. Community College Press, 1999; Smith, Cindra J. "Trusteeship in Community Colleges: A Guide for Effective Governance." Association of Community College Trustees, 2000.
###